
![]()
I can't believe I made it to 100 000.
Seems like only yesterday I hit 10 000. This was shortly before I started working here.
So roughly 90 000 messages in 2 years.
Wow, congrats Deezee, you have certainly been busy..![]()
Makes my 7,700 appear puny in comparison...
Thank you andro!
And 7,700 is a respectable number, don't you fret!
way to go dek ![]()
![]()
![]()
by my ever-so-rough calculations, i should have that many messages in about....oh.....20.75 years time...
Well.... you know how to speed it up right?
post lots of pointless messages?
hahaha
I was gonna say stop playing flash games and come talk to us![]()
that's not my fault....stoopid people making me play flash games....![]()
HAHAHA
Blame it on people why don't you.... you addict!
I is not stoopid
And I'm on 7635, btw ![]()
7636...
7637....
etc...
7639...
![]()
7,290.... I swear I've posted more than that...
Let me think
1.. 2.. 3.. 4.. ah crap, lost count.
maybe it seems more cos some posts are big ass long-winded ones...![]()
That's true... I should switch to only posting one paragraph at a time
3,154 (or 3,155 with this one)
Does the number of posts one makes have any bearing on how good, respected or sad a "tangler" is?
Since post count isn't prominently displayed like it is on some forums, I know I'm less aware of my post count or anyone else's count
By less aware I mean "almost entirely unaware"
and by almost entirely, I mean entirely
I also have more posts here than on forums I've been on longer... I think this is because of how consecutive posts get joined together into one contiguous thing, so "double posting" also isn't noticeable like it would be in other places.
Hell, I can post 4 times in a row without anyone blinking, try doing that on a phpBB board where it makes each post more obviously separated and someone will probably make a sarky remark about it
I see you have it down to a bit of a science SK (is that sarky...?)
i suppose somebody should say 'it's not the quantity but the quality that counts'.....
..not gonna be me though.
having not said that, there does seem to be a distinct lack of quality control round here....
AD, I've spent far too much time on forums... experience happens ![]()
Without naming names, I know a few people on Tangler whose posts are usually a complete waste of space. I'm sure many of you can agree.
HAHAHAHA
Morgan, you're a clown!
ok.....
ohhh you mean with my consecutive postings? i thought something else lol
guess i am a clown ![]()
heh heh Yes, with the postings...
Made me laugh out
After this I will have 9,152 which puts me about 1,500 behind Ponting, a handful more behind Waugh and Border, then better than 1500 to catch Lara and The Little Master.
Had to edit that because I forgot Lara. Plus this gets me one closer.
Also had to edit the previous for a typo. +1.
Oh Dear.. I actually thought for a second that there were Tangler members name Ponting and Waugh. By Border and esp :ara I had caught on - unless they really are members and I'm blindly unaware.
... I don't get it.
*crickets*
HAHAHAHAH
'Crickets' is right!!!
ROFL
Without naming names, I know a few people on Tangler whose posts are usually a complete waste of space.
C'mon Morgan, This is not like you. Let's have some names!
or alternatively, you could list everyone it's not. then you wouldn't have named them....
lol...
SYNTH
hmm?
Is that the list of people it isn't, or people it is? hmm?? ![]()
You'll never find out...
I just got it...
All of this ^^ is just an attempt to catch up with me isn't it?![]()
even if you add together the messages of everyone who has posted in this topic, it's still less than half of your total, dek.
See how hard I work?!
And you call me slack...
hrrrmph!
i don't see where the hard work comes into it.....![]()
My keyboard keys are hard.... I have to chisel the keys to form words
I;d like to swap the ' key with the ; key because I can;t seem to reach it anymore.
I need one of these, but portable.
Sending ...