I have been thinking that the idea of LOTU probably stems from the reason why most religions started a long time ago. Or reasons...

1. Faith - you feel better when you believe in something. Better about life. You have something to live for.

Hmmm, ok, no second one, but lots of others lead from this.

You get faith, then you wonder, hmm, what happens when I die? So the faith builder (Cam) tells you. Well, that's what they did many years ago.

Dying Ug "Elder, I'm dying, what will happen to me, I'm scared."

Elder "Um, um, don't worry, remember we all praise the mighty bright sun, well when you die you go there and are very happy forever."

Near dead Ug "oh, thanks Elder.... errrrrggggggg (dies)."
 

Then you build up a system of rules.

Then you have religion.

So just be careful where this leaves Father Reilly.
 

Main reason why I didn't join the Facebook group... Personally, it felt hypocritical to rejects all other religions (including the one I was born in) and join one for atheists.

I did read Cameron's post about his reasons for naming LOTU, but that wasn't enough to change my mind.

Am up for a discussion on the topic though!

I guess LOTU isn't necessarily for people who are comfortable being solo atheists. It's more for people who are new atheists and need a community. And for old atheists who want to help the new atheists. I'm not doing it for me. I'm doing it in the hope that we can help others accept rational thinking and therefore make the world a better, safer place.

You are right Cam. The reason I wouldn't 'join' the 'church' is that I like to do my own thinking and reach my own conclusions. Am not one who needs to belong to feel secure. Hope LOTU helps with your final goal

As mentioned, I was initially miffed with the terminology you used, but as I said, after reading your blog post, I understand why. And who knows, it might even serve to subvert the system.
 

I'm not doing it for me. I'm doing it in the hope that we can help others accept rational thinking and therefore make the world a better, safer place.

Such a commendable and generous attiude.   It begs a few questions:

What is your version of rational thinking?

Are only atheists capable of rational thinking?

Why would the outcomes of your version of rational thinking be better at making the world a better, safer place than anyone elses version of rational thinking?