Simple enough. The goal is to have the last post.
Note: Rules rephrased to eliminate ambiguity.
The last, at present, as well as first posts are mine!
hahahah C'mon, let's go!!
umm.. how is there ever going to be a last post?
Also, I'm winning!
Not so fast! Hah!
*narrows eyes*...
hey wait, I'm winning again
you guys really have nothing else to do, right? :rolleyes:
Oh yeah?!?!
she said as she took 1st place... *also rolls eyes*
/me adds productivity to dekrazee1 and Super-King
Come on guys.... catch up!
catch up? me? NEEEEVEEER!!
TAG!
*eats last post* Ha! How are you going to get it now?
This post won't be the last.
i win
No sorry, I win.
no you dont
You wish.
No you wish, for me to poop on you!
What? Eww. I'm taking the last post away from such coarse humor.
and it gets stolen by me
this is silly... oh and I win... for like what, a second?
6 minutes but w/e
LOCKED BY MODERATOR
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY.
Why??
damn.
i choose to not understand that
Because he said so obviously.
(thinking of another ruse...)
hahaha keep thinking![]()
If you reply to this post you are confirming that you are of questionable sexuality.....
*stabs Mitch with a spork and takes last post*
I feel I should warn you all that sometimes people get a little violent with this game...
ow!! *rubs arm* that hurt...
HAHAHAHAHA
go spork yourself!
OOoooooooo We gots a brawl on our hands!!
fight fight fight fight
ROFL!
*forces Dek to eat a spork-full of peanut butter*
*spews all over Mitch*
Ho! It's getting too violent in here. I'll watch the last post so it doesn't get hurt while durring the fight.
*snaps fingers*
*spew dissapears*
everyone else: "Holy shit - how did he do that?"
shift change. hand it over.
HAHAHAHA Maaaaan, this group is where I'm gonna come for entertainment now..... you guys are all hilarious!
*tags katana*
*climbs outside ropes*
*pulls wrestling suit out of butt crack*
*sells dek front row ticket*
HAHAHAHA
gets pom pom ready
*postnaps*
*steals*
*trips then snatches*
*hits you in the back of the head and steals back*
Simple enough. The person who posts last wins.
"LAST"
I posted "LAST" by the terms of the rules, I WIN!!!
taken
Like it would be that easy john robie....
What was that Riot??![]()
taken again...
late start but first to finish
finish second
"last post" (tm) David Soul
keep trying![]()
"post lasts" (tm ) David Soul
last
hahahahaah
I win!
Are you sure?
no
Too late for me to post "last" (tm) so Indeed I believe he does... I just couldn't type fast enough cause that was where i was heading...
Check the rules .... they are unambiguous.
Simple enough. The person who posts last wins.
Exactly... thats why I said you won.
Well lets see what 5thWall has to say.![]()
Id love to be the winner here, but gotta make it legit.
Exactly, so I win
no you dont
first
Not
you're right .... last
wrong again
last wins
Sorry the rules were kind of ambiguous, I'll change them so there's no more confusion.
As it happens, this game never ends. By last here it's meant last numerically not the word last. In other words if there are 51 posts then the 51st is the last, at least until someone else posts and then there are 52 posts and the 52nd post is the last post.
Now had I said "The person who posts 'last' wins" then it would be a different story, and the game would probably not be very fun.
Having said all that, this is, at the time of posting anyway, the last post. Therefore, I win.
![]()
You can't change the rules. The rules had no provision for the changing of the rules. Chapel wins.
He and I figured it out.. He posted first. Simple.
And editing the starting point is quite simple too. Cheating.
I haven't changed the rules. They still mean exactly what I meant them to mean when the game started. I rephrased the rules so they would be clear. They were not, as you said, unambiguous in their first incarnation as evidenced by the fact that people were disputing them. Last as used in the rules then and now mean last numerically. There is nothing in the original language to suggest otherwise.
Q.E.D. This is the last post at the time of posting and I win.
I win
No. the time stamp shows you changed the original post one minute before you're clarification post. (and after a couple dozen posts with the rules as written.) And no they didn't mean exactly what you say. The fact you couldn't figure out your own game ... well enough said.
im king
of
the
hill
,
look
at
me
im
still
leading
the
pack
with
a
list
of
posts
.
ive
now
been
king
for
a
whole
Stop it!!!!!!
minute
My notifier is going nuts dude
GAH!!!!
oh sorry
bump
Phew!
thanks Riot! hehehe
bored
I see what you're doing here, and it won't work. I'll play along for a while though.![]()
First, in my clarification post I state that I did rephrase the rules, also I've added to the first post an explanation for the edit. So your not so subtle implication that I've been less than transparent in this process is blatantly false.
Second if we look at the rules in their original phrasing "The person who posts last wins." There is nothing to indicate that 'last' is not modifying 'posts.' "The person" is clearly the subject. "posts" is the verb. "last" is an adverb. You've yet to bring any evidence to the table that would indicate otherwise.
Finally, if we were to assume you were right, there was no indication under which conditions one would need to post the word 'last' to win, it would have to mean that anyone and everyone who posts the word 'last' wins. This is clearly impossible as the undisputed subject of the sentence was singular. Clearly you have no grammatical foundation to stand on.
*scratching head*
*looking around*
I forsee many computer programs plaqued with bugs
Wha?
yeah... Wha??
non sequitar
Kya?
Kentucky Youth Assembly?
Non sequitar? Where? Point it out and explain please.
"non sequitar" is a non sequitar
Is it really? I never knew that. How interesting. I win.
Kya = what in Hindi...
I thought we were turning multilingual for a while there
A lot of things in that category.
Kya, I never new ye.
Now you know!
cool i can get my post count up by just posting sensless things
last
again
I see the original post changed a second time
Now 10:58
Yes I said I changed it again.
oraculum
Yes Phong, except no one here knows their post count or where they stand! hahaha
john robie (verse 9:29)
chapel (verse 10:16)
Bricoleur (verse 10:17)
Wouldn't that be chapter and verse?
This is officially the most new posts in a single topic I have ever come onto Tangler and found
Now please cease doing so - seeing "Tangle Games (256)" in the recent activity thing was almost scary
>SK
People are only trying to win the game since the rule change (after I won it before).
Like this.
Last time, no rule change.
>5th
Eh?
Oh look I'm winning again.
Are you?
I don't think any of you are winning. I think I am!!!![]()
No you are not. Well not any more.
Ahw shoot - there is someone else awake in here. I thought everyone playing was on the other side of the world... Which would let me win for more than 5 minutes![]()
bump
@john
I provided a lengthly explanation of why the game was allways worded to be played this way above.
Last post's mine btw.
Someone else awake? It's 2 PM here!
Its 1:30 here
> 5th
HaHaHa
Nice try.
You still changed the rules. After I had won.
Still in front.
Prove it.
(that I changed the rules that is)
If he already won why does he keep posting?
First you wrote
Simple enough. The person who posts last wins.
Then you changed it to
Simple enough. The goal is to have the last post.
They mean the same thing. Come on, if you're going to support a fallacious argument at least put some creativity into your defense of it.
Go argue in some other thread, I'm using this one
I'll go if you let me have the last post...
They mean the same thing?
Even to You?
Why did you change them?
Ah-Ha!
Glad to see this is going so well. Maybe what I need to do is make a stealth post tomorrow during the day while everyone in the US is off picnicing and everyone in Australia is asleep.
I never sleep.
Certainly not now.
I changed them because certain people who will remain nameless *coughjohnnbriccough* wanted to read the rules incorrectly at it was easier for them to do that in the original phrasing. This and another topic in General Conversation only confirms my suspicions about the posters in question. Dek probably knows what I mean by this.
Additionally I have the last post.![]()
And now I do
Seriously, I need this thread for some metrics, please stop using it.
@5th
OK I will leave your topic alone.
Finally
Later on when I have won
... What's going on?
this is quite a stupid game... no one will EVER win!!
I intend to have children, grandchildren and if necessary great grandchildren, who will carry on in my name.
I can honestly say I am in awe of your dedication.
I am working on becoming immortal, just to win this game
Good luck with that.
Thank you
Youre welcome.
Now stay out of my thread!
good bye sweet price.... leave this thread and let me WIN!!!
I gonna post this then crash the internet.![]()
Crash the internet, psst, child's play. I will destroy all electronics.
oh noes
If you crash the internet, wouldn't that destroy the last post? And if noone has the last post then how could anyone, including you, win?
coz it'd still say so on my screen
You'd just never refresh the page?
no point, there'e be no internet
I see, good luck with that then.
bump
Let's Dance!
*dances*
o-\-<
o-|-<
o-/-<
<(**)<
<(**)>
>(**)>
frist psot
lsat psot
nxet psot
flowoing psot
bluekatana's dancing guy reminds me of fireball guy
(>'_')>=========o
it was some kind of bootleg kirby XD
hahahaah
I see everyone has been busy!
bump
This topic will now be locked.
Only kidding ... last
I think of crime when I'm in a NY state of mind.
you know... this could get addicting!
this new power is awesome
but it doesn't apply in THIS game!
I can give the power and I can take it away!
aw crap
power? what power?
Just passing through.....tum ti tum ti tum
dearly beloved are you listening
I cant remember a word that you were saying
Just passing back...tumutitumtitum
not going to jail, just visiting
visiting time is over. time for the real crazies to come back...
im crazy look
LOL - does the fact that i like it mean I am crazy too????
quite possibly
*ahem*
O.O professor Umbridge?
huh?
I was *ahem*ing at the crazies talk....
Deloris Umbidge from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix does a little *hem hem* thing when someone is talking.
sorry for being such a dork.
hahahaha No apologies needed
I read Unbridge, but in my head, it was processed as Cambridge.... go figure... Maybe its cos of the word association game
*shrug*
Hello all, I've come to claim the last post.
NEVAR! >:(
But, but... it's my precious.
mine now
Uh huh Sure
I'm amazed Phong is speaking in the first place!
Why are you people still here in my game? The one I have alrady won.
i come out of my shell every now and then ... i'm shy![]()
I'm willing to declare you the winner if indeed the original wording of the rules should be read as you claim. Why don't you prepare a sentence diagram illustrating your position while I guard the last post.
Come, lemme relieve you of your duty...
I believe I have already fully explained the reasons for my victory.
I must have missed them, and I'll tell you up front that I'm not considering anything that doesn't include a sentence diagram.
Sentence diagram?
@5th
"Up front"
Last time you were up front, you went on to change it. So no! Your demands cannot be met.
Then you don't win.
I do. 'Cause I've got the last post.
No I have.
Come on, how hard could one little sentence diagram be?
very hard?
As I don't have at my ready disposal the graphics tools for a sentence diagram, and can't be bothered manufacturing an aproximation of a specific one I declare myself the winner.
Here however is a basic example of one. So your basic criterion (I'm not considering anything that doesn't include a sentence diagram.) is met

Still winning and aplying all the rules.
I just won!
Now you're losing
No I won outright because I have followed the rules.
After taking your argument into consideration I find insufficient evidence to declare you the winner. The game shall continue.
As I said you will just change the rules to suit. So I win.
I said I'd take your argument into consideration provided it contained a sentence diagram. You submitted a sentence diagram without an argument. I found the blank space where your argument should have been insufficient to prove your point. I did consider it though.
In the future you will note that a deceleration of victory does not constitute an argument.
How on earth do you slow down a victory? I s i t p o s s i b l e t o &