Interesting interview ! With good point on e-marketing strategies

The good thing about social networking is that every single participant decide that a link to a site- is a good link to the site. I dont believe that a small number of editors are representative to define good sites or bad sites. I have a number of reasons to think like this. First there are 5000 languages around the world and speakers who define the English/American language in different ways, so to create good content have more sides to it than some speakers of one language can define. Secondly, people live quite different than americans around the world. I think that what is neccessary is to take this global thinking to a locally standpoint of view. There is no help to people in general, but only those who have the same living standards as the editors. What is interesting with this website is that they treat different people in different ways.  A big break in political correctness, is not the worse thing, or is it?